Home

Pinhook Rye Humor Cask Strength Review

Tasting Notes & Ratings

Expert Rating: TBD

Pinhook Rye Humor Cask Strength Photo

Distillery Tasting Notes

Made by CJS Beverage Corp ~ Pinhook

Deep and dense aromas of dark chocolate, candied black licorice, and vanilla extract set the stage for robust flavors of raisins, tobacco, cinnamon stick, and sarsaparilla.

Review This Whiskey

Details

Proof: 114
Alcohol by volume (ABV): 57%
Aged: Over 4 years
Mash Bill: 95% Rye and 5% Malted Barley
Retail (MSRP): Provide this info

What whiskeys do YOU think have a similar taste profile as Pinhook Rye Humor Cask Strength? (Login to answer)

Click this button to find Bourbons or other whiskeys that might be similar in taste profile. Results below. Don't forget our Bourbon search engine where you can search by flavor profile.

Reviews by the People of Pinhook Rye Humor Cask Strength

The People have not posted a review for this whiskey. Be the first!
Review This Whiskey

Ratings Key

Ratings breakdown based on a 100 point scale.

  • 90-100 Exceptional
  • 80-89 Very Good
  • 70-79 Average
  • 60-69 Below Average
  • 50-60 Drain Pour
Card image cap
Provide Feedback

Would you mind giving us feedback? What do you like or dislike about the website? How can we make it better? What features would you like to see added?

The Top 10 Terms Every New Bourbon Enthusiast Should Know

Bourbon is one of the United States’ finest contributions to the world of whiskeys. Legally, bourbon mash must have at least 51% corn and undergo aging in a new charred oak barrel. Regardless of...Read More

Ranking The Best Bourbon Bottle Designs

There is beauty in nature and another in art. There is still another kind of beauty where art, utility, function, and engineering come into play. That is where creative and artful bourbon bottle desig...Read More

A Review of Old Forester 1897 Bottled in Bond

It’s so strange that this is my first review of Old Forester 1897 Bottled in Bond. I’ve had this bottle for a while, and I thought I had reviewed it previously, but I guess I was wrong.&nb...Read More